Identifying my Personal Leadership Style Essay - 936 Words

PERSONAL LEADERSHIP STYLE Strengths Finder 2.0 Using the Strength Finders 2.0 Assessment, I was able to identify my personal strengths, which would identify my personal leadership skills. My strength assessment results where Harmony, Consistency, Empathy, Achiever, and Belief. This paper will identify each strength, how they relate to my leadership style and approach to leadership. The first strength identified is Harmony. Harmony is defined in the freedictionary.com as an agreement in a feeling or opinion (Dictionary, 2009). In Strength Finder 2.0 Harmony is describes as you look for areas of agreement, there is little to be gained by conflict and friction, so you seek to hold them at a minimum (Rath, Strengths Finders 2.0,†¦show more content†¦Consistency should be a big factor in nursing leadership, people should be evaluated on their work not by how they talk up to the boss. Another important factor of Consistency in the areas of leadership is when employees know what is expected of them they are able to be more productive. Consistency is a big strength in my leadership skills, I look at the work people do and how they treat others, then in how the suck up or show off. The third strength listed by Strengths Finder 2.0 is Empathy. Empathy is defined by thefreedictionary.com as the identification with and understanding of another’s feelings, and motives (Dictionary, 2009). Strengths Finder 2.0 describes Empathy: you can sense the emotions of those around you, you feel what they are feeling, you don’t necessarily agree with their perspective, and you don’t feel pity for the person’s perspective (Rath, Strengths Finder 2.0, 2007). Empathy is a good strength to have it makes you as an individual to be more open to what others are feeling, but with this their feelings can’t be a cause of conflict within the workplace. Empathy can be a good leadership skill to have especially in nursing being aware to what employees are feeling especially through a difficult time can help in how you approach the individual. For my personal leadership skills Empathy has helped me to identify when someone was having a difficult time and to help guideShow MoreRelatedPersonal Leadership : An Effective Leadership Style1644 Words   |  7 PagesPERSONAL LEADERSHIP PORTRAIT Developing an effective leadership style requires one to become aware of their strengths and weakness when operating in the role of a servant leader. Identifying personal preference can assist with better aligning expectations and goals that one would like to see demonstrated in those they lead. Taking on the role as a servant leader requires patience, understanding, and most importantly compassion for others. As a servant leader he or she should always considerRead MoreThe Importance Of A Co Creation Leadership878 Words   |  4 Pagesnecessary steps to foster a co-creation environment. Co-Creation Leadership Culture In the leadership culture, the leader and subordinate must be responsive to the needs of the company. As noted in Figure 1, the channel of communication is a powerful tool for the synthesis of information, problem solving and innovation. According to Ramaswamy and Chopra (2014), a co-creation leadership culture can be created in six steps that entail identifying the key stakeholders, create an environment that reflectsRead MoreLeadership Development : A Strategic Approach820 Words   |  4 PagesFuture Leadership Development Consequently, leadership development requires that organizations take a strategic approach such as coaching, training programs, mentoring, and/or virtual learning. A critical analysis and evaluation of what I learned regarding leadership development is that organizations must evaluate organizational needs and individual skills and competencies; assess an individual readiness to learn; create performance measures and evaluation criteria to measure training and learningRead MoreTransformational Leadership : Transformational Leader991 Words   |  4 Pagestheir talents for greater potential success. All leaders share these abilities, how they achieve them from those on their team may vary. In this paper, I will examine transformational leadership in well-known leaders, the examples they exhibit and these can apply to me personally. The Transformational Leadership Style Transformational leaders have an ability to not only gain the trust their team, but also inspire those around them as tools in a proverbial â€Å"toolbox†. By convincing those that followRead MoreDemocratic Leadership : Advance Practise Nursing977 Words   |  4 PagesDemocratic Leadership In Advance Practise Nursing Seynor Massalee Kennedy South University Democratic Leadership In Advance Practise Nursing Professional leadership comprises of mentoring, empowering and participating actively in organizations. The APN, as an effective leader should be able to collaborate with team members, mentored and be mentor and provide empowerment (Hamric, Hanson, Tracy, O’Grady, 2014). Authoritarian, Democratic and Delegative are the three styles of leadershipsRead MoreEvaluation Of The Field Supervisor s Role896 Words   |  4 Pagesa hands on approach to the social work student whereas strengths and weakness are identifying and feedback is given as a means to improve the skill levels of the student practitioner. McTighe (2011) proposes that clinicians must take an inventory of self, knowledge about ones’ beliefs and values and be open to self-discovery as a mode to contribute to her identification as a therapist. Understanding one’s personal values as to not impose these on out client system is an important ethical standardRead MoreDemocratic Leadership in Nursing1707 Words   |  7 Pages(Rogers, 2012). Moreover, the several leadership styles that we have discussed in class can either complement or diminish the standards of practice. These styles include autocratic, democratic, laissez-faire, and participative. However, this paper will focus on the democratic style which I have identified as my own leadership style. Personal Leadership Style To begin, there are many personal characteristics that have led me to identify with the democratic leadership style. A democratic leader is one whoRead MoreThe Purpose Of This Essay Is To Identify And Explain Key1314 Words   |  6 Page sexplain key learning overview and action plan paper will summarize what you have learned in this course and provide a power and politics action plan that you can use immediately in your business. Furthermore, it is the intention to highlight leadership style, organization stability, culture, and diversity of the workforce as well as identify the need for communication within an organization. The individual factors contributing to the political behavior in organizations include; the political natureRead MorePersonal Interpretations and Observations of Leadership Theories1697 Words   |  7 PagesThroughout the course of this paper, I will the address the four leadership theories consisting of transformational leadership, charismatic leadership, situational leadership, and ethical leadership. It is my intent to not only identify the components of the different leadership theories, but to apply personal observations to the four theories and how I have observed their defined interactions in the workplace. Transformational Leadership Transformational leaders are able to see the â€Å"bigger picture†Read MoreA Theory Of Leadership Effectiveness972 Words   |  4 PagesFred Fiedler introduces the world Fiedler’s Contingency Theory in his â€Å"A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness† in 1967. According to Leadership centra.com, Fiedler’s contingency theory is one of the contingency theories that states that effective leadership depends not only on the style of leading but on the control over a situation. Fred Fiedler believes there are two types of leader; the first type of leader is task-oriented leader. A task-oriented leader is concerted on completing the job and

Jane Austen’s Novel Pride and Prejudice Essay - 874 Words

Recipe for Happiness â€Å"A large income is the best recipe for happiness I ever heard of† (Austen). The bluntness of this quote fully encompasses the main theme of an advantageous marriage for the English novelist, Jane Austen. Her realism, biting irony and social commentary have gained her historical importance among scholars and critics (Southam). Austen’s major novels, including Pride and Prejudice, were composed between the years 1795-1815. During those twenty years England was at the height of its power facing many historical landmarks (Thomson). It is no coincidence that Jane Austen’s novel, Pride and Prejudice, coincides directly with the historical events of this time period. The most visible impact that is historically†¦show more content†¦Because of the family aspirations to gain wealth and social standing along with the need for financial survival, courtship was a central focus for women’s lives (Sheehan), shown through the pursuit of marriage for each of Mrs. Bennett’s daughters. However in the late eighteenth century the conception of women’s rights began to change. â€Å"In the language of Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke, woman should be treated as the rational equals of men† (Wollstonecraft). Just as Wollstonecraft suggests, the idea of equality became more prominent and social conditions for women began to change during the late 1800’s. More educational opportunities were available to woman, but they were still considered weaker than men (Womens Suffrage Movement). All these historical commentaries were portrayed in Pride and Prejudice. Elizabeth Bennett was not financially independent due to the conflict of her father’s property and depended on marriage for this reason. However she also shows the conflicting transformations in women’s roles that occurred by asserting her intellectual and moral independence to Mr. Darcy during his first proposal. Although her financial and social desires desperately needed to be met, she denies his proposal and asserts that independence. She does the same to Mr. Collins despite securing her families inheritance. The Military. The Militia was another form of social class in the 1800’s.Show MoreRelated Jane Austens Pride and Prejudice: Novel and Movie Essay652 Words   |  3 PagesJane Austens Pride and Prejudice: Novel and Movie Pride and Prejudice, the novel by Jane Austen, and Sense and Sensibility, the movie based on the novel by Austen, share many striking similarities. These similarities lie in the characters, plots and subplots between these characters, the settings, and the overall style and themes used in creating the two works. Jane Austen uses extremely similar characters in almost the exact same situation in Pride and Prejudice and Sense and SensibilityRead MoreThe Character of Elizabeth Bennet in Jane Austens Novel Pride and Prejudice1705 Words   |  7 PagesThe Character of Elizabeth Bennet in Jane Austens novel Pride and Prejudice The man plot of Austens novel Pride and Prejudice revolves around Elizabeth (or Lizzy) Bennet, who belongs to a family of five sisters, and her relationship with eligible bachelor Mr Darcy. However, Pride and Prejudice is a very complex novel, with many different subplots going on. One of these is the relationship between Elizas older sister Jane, and Bingley, Darcys friend. There are many misunderstandings withinRead MoreDoes Jane Austens Pride and Prejudice Follow the Conventions of a Romantic Novel?1810 Words   |  8 PagesDoes Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice follow the conventions of a romantic novel? A conventionally romantic novel usually focuses on the relationship between a physically attractive man and woman. The hero and heroine usually meet early in the story and fall in love at first sight. The two lovers may, more often than not, have to overcome obstacles in order to be together, but in the end, it seems that love conquers all. Pride and Prejudice does fall into this romance category; its often consideredRead MoreThe Lack of Social Mobility in Jane Austen’s novel Pride and Prejudice2139 Words   |  9 PagesPride and Prejudice, a novel written by Jane Austen during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century is often thought of as simply a love story and although on the surface this is true, it is in fact much more than that. Austen focuses greatly on the class system and lack of social mobility allowed in England during this period (the Napoleonic Wars, 1797-1815) and the pride and prejudice that these social divides reveal, as well as the personal pride a nd prejudice shown by individual charactersRead MoreWrite a Critical Analysis of Jane Austen’s Novel Pride and Prejudice, Paying Special Attention to Family Politics. Comment on the Elizabeth – Darcy Relationship. What Makes Elizabeth and Darcy Different from All Other Characters in the Novel?909 Words   |  4 Pagescritical analysis of Jane Austen’s novel Pride and Prejudice, paying special attention to family politics. Comment on the Elizabeth – Darcy relationship. What makes Elizabeth and Darcy different from all other characters in the novel? Student: Daniela Gospodinova In the 19th century in England, when Jane Austen writes, the marriage is something that every young woman wants - to marry a single, wealthy men, showing both joy and gratitude. In the beginning of the novel, the opening sentenceRead MoreEssay on Jane Austen Novels: Success After Death1679 Words   |  7 PagesJane Austen Novels: Success after Death Chuck Leddy, a notable critic, stated Upon her death in 1817, English novelist Jane Austen was completely unknown in the literary world. Why would someone as brilliant as Jane Austen not be world known? By 1817, Austen had already published one of her masterpieces Sense and Sensibility, and it seemed to not bring in as much success as it would later on in life. But the dry spell would eventually end. Two hundred years after Jane Austens death, her booksRead MoreJane Austen and Her Feminism1158 Words   |  5 PagesJane Austen and Her Feminism ---analyzing of feminism revealed in Pride and Prejudice Introduction It is universally acknowledged that Jane Austen was a major woman novelist in English; but it is also a truth that almost as universally ignored that Jane Austen was a feminist. By intensively reading her six novels (Sense and Sensibility, Pride and Prejudice, Northanger Abbey, Mansfield Park, Emma and Persuasion) and studying feminism, I have found some significant and fresh thingsRead MoreThe Influence of Regency England in Pride and Prejudice1604 Words   |  7 PagesHenry Fielding noted in his novel, Joseph Andrews, that the class-conscious population continued to feel that even â€Å"the least familiarity [with those below in social rank was] a degradation† (137). One of Regency England’s most beloved writers, Jane Austen, continued the tradition of casting literature as a reflection of contemporary society’s biases. Her novels brim with indicators of Regency England’s preconceptions. The characters in Austen’s novel, Pride and Prejudice, seek economic security throughRead MoreNorthanger Abbey as a Precursor to Pride and Prejudice Essay1614 Words   |  7 PagesJane Austen’s Northanger Abbey is frequently described as a novel about reading—reading novels and reading people—while Pride and Prejudice is said to be a story about love, about two people overcoming their own pride and prejudices to realize their feelings for each other. If Pride and Prejudice is indeed about how two stubborn youth have misjudged each other, then why is it that this novel is so infrequently viewed to be connected to Austen’s original novel about misjudgment and reading one’s fellowsRead MoreComparative Study: Letters to Alice and Pride and Prejudice1502 Words   |  7 Pagesportrayed in Pride and Prejudice are creatively reshaped in Letters to Alice. The two texts, Letters to Alice and Pride and Prejudice, mirror and contrast the central values shared and explored by evaluating them; presenting them against Jane Austens context and that of Fay Weldon. Mirroring Austens novel, Weldon presents the central values for women such as the social values of moral behaviour, independence, and, literary values of reading and writing, from Pride and Prejudice and adapts them

How far were divisions among its opponents responsible free essay sample

How far were divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881 1905? Internal and external divisions amongst opposing political groups of the Tsar were important and somewhat responsible to the survival of Tsarist Russia. However, other factors such as religion and repression were also effective in keeping the Tsar in a state of power. On the one hand, one of the main reasons why divisions among its opponents were responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule was due to external divisions involving all opposing political parties. This was because the parties did not work together as they were all divided in their aims and methods in order to achieve different targets. None realised that by working together they would have a greater impact on the current political standing of Russia. The main external divisions involved the Constitutional Democrat (Kadets) and the Social Revolutionary (Socialist) parties. Both of these parties had their own separate beliefs on what Russia needed and how in which it should change, yet due to the differing opinions they refused to work together to solve this. The Social Revolutionaries believed that the future of Russia was down to the peasants and the working class so they wanted to give the peasants their own land as well as improve living conditions for the working class. The assassination of Tsar Alexander II and acts of terrorism were among their tactics however, the Constitutional Democrats were against these acts of violence. They were the most moderate party and believed in votes and discussions as a way to express their views and opinions. They wanted to bolish autocracy and have the power shared amongst a democratic government. The parties also had different support groups as the Social Revolutionaries were aimed at and were very popular with the peasants whereas the Constitutional Democrats were more focused at the middle class and mainly those with professions such as a lawyer, doctor or merchant. This was partly responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule as although there were some similarities in the aims and objectives of the parties, the major differences in methods and tactics meant that singularly each roup didnt have the strength to achieve their goals and even though some tactics they had in common, it wasnt enough as they refused to work together to provide more force in their campaigns. This meant that opposition against the Tsarists rule was weakened to quite a great extent and this would have benefited the Tsar significantly as the parties could not contribute together. A further reason why divisions among its opponents were responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule was due to internal factors within the parties themselves. The most prominent example of this would be the internal division within the Social Democrat party which caused them to split into the Bolsheviks and Mensheviks when discussing party membership. The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin who won the debate, consisted of the majority of the party and Lenin suggested that only people dedicated to the main objective was to create a small revolutionary elite in order to combat the Tsar and so as not to be discovered by the secret police. The Mensheviks, led by Martov, rgued that the party should be open to anyone who accepted the objectives of the party and was willing to follow instructions from the leaders. This disagreement was based on different beliefs regarding the role of the party. Lenin and his supporters believed that the party should be one prepared to seize power as soon as possible whereas for Martov and his supporters, they believed the main purpose was to spread propaganda and increase awareness about the working class or proletariat. He failed to believe that Russia was ready for a revolution any time soon. Over the ollowing years the division become permanent and they eventually grew into separate political parties and, of them both, the secret police regarded the Mensheviks as the most threatening because they encouraged a working class discontent. As the working class made up about 80-90% of the Russian population at this time, unhappiness among them would cause the greatest uprising and the most difficult to control. This was partly responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule because it meant that the parties themselves (especially the Social Democrats) would not be trong enough to have any significant impact on affecting the Tsars rule. If they couldnt even function amongst themselves then they wouldnt be able to communicate and work together enough to challenge the Tsar and his power. This meant that opposition against the Tsarists rule was again weakened to some extent and this would have benefited the Tsar greatly. On the other hand, key reasons responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule were due to other factors such as religion. The Orthodox Church was very important to Russians and most extremely religious. By preaching blind obedience to God, it encouraged blind obedience to social superiors including the Tsars and as the Tsar was a monarch with complete autocratic control and was brought up into the Romanov dynasty, many believed that it was the Tsars God-given birthright to rule, and by total authority. Due to this, it was seen to be going against God himself and His choices by opposing to the Tsar. However, having said this, many also believed that God had turned His back on the Tsars due to the Khodynka Tragedy. It was a human stampede that occurred on 30th May 1896 on Khodynka Field, Moscow where hundreds were killed in the festivities following the coronation of Tsar Nicholas II, which led to the deaths of 1,389 people. This was partly responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule because Russian people would see it as going against God by going against the Tsar and for most it was seem an impossible thing to do. This could be described as deference to the Tsar and although some may not agree to it, defying God would be to commit a crime much worse due to how important the Orthodox Church was in society. A further reason responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule was due to repression against many Russian people. This included factors such as the army and the Okhrana in order to keep any political opponents or general opponents down and without a chance of success. The Okhrana are known as the Department for Protecting the Public Security and Order and were the secret police for the Tsar. It was formed to combat political terrorism and revolutionary uprising or activity and did this through many ways, the most common being violence. This created fear amongst the peasants as well as the which was a prison labour camp. Due to this, it prevented many Russian people from acting against the Tsar or Joining any political opposition groups and in this way it was partly responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule. However, having said this, many peasants at this time believed that had nothing to lose so for them this was an incentive to try make a difference while they could and stand up to the Tsar and what he stood for. This dramatically increased the number of supporters for the Social Revolutionary party. In conclusion, both internal and external division among political opponents were responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881 1905 more than other factors, and external division was slightly more important as it prevented the parties from working together to provide a united and unstoppable force against the Tsar. Much more could have been achieved from the collaboration of all political parties as they would have provided more strength to each other. This is eventually realised, which creates a significant impact to Russian politics after 1905.

Reflection Essay #1 free essay sample

Introduction: The two topics I have chosen for my reflection paper are â€Å"The Authority of the Bible† and â€Å"Faith in God†. I have chosen these two topics because for me they are perhaps the two most important topics that we have discussed so far. What I will attempt to provide in this paper are my personal life experiences and beliefs in regard to my faith in God and the authority of the Bible while reinforcing these personal beliefs with scripture as well as from material that we have read in class. Faith in God: Have you ever been going through a hard time and had someone say to you â€Å"everything will be fine, all you have to do is have faith. † I know this has happened to me more times than I can even begin to count. And more times than not when I was younger I would simply nod my head and think â€Å"yeah right, what does that even mean anyway, have faith? † Well, that’s a great question, because I feel that faith can have a multitude of different meanings. However, the meaning that I want to focus on is bars none the most important kind of faith we can ever experience; and that is of course faith in God. Growing up I never knew much about being a Christian or the importance of having faith in God. In fact, the argument could be easily made that I was an atheist. Don’t get me wrong, it wasn’t that the Christian religion wasn’t introduced to me a time or ten as I was growing up. No, actually just the opposite was the case, I can recall being forced to go to church on Sunday morning, Sunday night, and on Wednesday evenings for Bible study. However I was going for all the wrong reasons; I was going because I was being made to go rather than because I wanted to go. In making me attend church in this manner as a youth I developed a rebellious attitude and/or resentment towards everything that was being said by the pastor. In other words, I as a child had heard the words that were being preached but, I chose to rebel rather than believe. You’re probably wondering why I am sharing these childhood experiences with you. I’m sharing them because I believe that once you the reader have an understanding of how unlikely it was for someone like me to have â€Å"faith in God† that perhaps you will be able to better understand why I feel the way I do today about the subject of faith. Today I feel that faith in God is essential in living life to glorify God and essential for salvation. It is the key between simply existing or living life to its fullest. It is the driving force that pushes me to believe in things that would otherwise be unbelievable. It is through my faith in God that I am able to claim victory in all situations that I am encountered with in this world. So how does a person go from atheist to devout believer in the power of faith? I’m sure that answer would vary from person to person. But for me it was through the saving grace of God that I was able to have faith in God. It wasn’t until I was able to believe that I could be (or was worthy of being) loved that I could begin to understand faith in God. However, once I allowed God to enter my heart that all of my previous conceptions about faith would be changed forever. I associate this time era in my life to the scripture we discussed last week (1 Corinthians 13:11) â€Å"When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me. † Meaning for me that my life before God’s grace I was foolish like a child whereas afterwards (after God’s grace) I was able to begin growing as an adult and learning adult (Godly) things. The Bible has 61 different verses about â€Å"faith in God† (www. openbible 2014). Some of which tie perfectly into my understanding and beliefs of what faith in God is. Verses such as Hebrews 11:1-6, Romans 1:17, Romans 10:17, and Ephesians 2:8 are all wonderful references that God has given us to better understand faith. But there are other places that give great insight to faith as well. Take for example the quote that is provided in our Praxis book on page 9 by Westminster Shorter Catechism â€Å"Question: What is faith in Jesus Christ? Answer: Faith in Jesus Christ is a saving grace, whereby we receive and rest upon him alone for salvation, as he is offered to us in the gospel. † For me this really hit the mark and fit perfectly for explaining how I feel about faith in God. The Authority of the Bible: So how would someone go about validating the authority of the bible? After all there are several different books from several different religions out there that also claim to have been God inspired. So with that being known what means would be best to show without question that the Bible is in fact the one and only true word of God? I suppose I could use archaeology to show the historical evidence that has been discovered over the years that strongly supports what we are told in the Bible. Archaeological finds like the Dead Sea Scrolls that were discovered at Khirbet Qumran in the West Bank that contained a collection of 972 ancient texts. 225 of which are Biblical texts. The great importance of the Dead Sea scrolls is unimaginable due to their historical, religious, and linguistic contributions because they include the earliest known surviving manuscripts of works that would later be included in the Hebrew Bible canon (OT). These manuscripts have been dated to various ranges between 408 BCE and 318 CE and yet when scholar’s compared our modern text to this earlier text it revealed the remarkable accuracy to which the scribes copied the sacred texts. However, while I feel that archaeological finds like this and others like it are of immense value and significance and make a very impressive argument for my case, I don’t feel that they alone hold to key to the point I am attempting to make. So, if history isn’t the method I want to use show the authority of the Bible how about I attempt to use science to prove my case? There are many out there that would argue that the Bible is not a book of science and that it’s primarily purpose is that of inspiration or guidance. However, I would argue that they are (in a word) wrong. As a matter of fact I would go one further and show that the Bible actually has several places in it that revealed scientific facts long before they were scientifically discovered to be fact by mankind. Perhaps one of my favorite examples of this would be the fact that the earth is in fact round. Most people when they think about the discovery of the earth being round think of famous explorer Christopher Columbus who would have to all but beg fellow seamen to sail with him because they were terrified that one day Columbus would accidently sail off the face of the earth. During that time era using the scientific facts as they were known at the time people believed whole heartedly that the earth was flat and that at its edges was great water falls that led to an unknown watery abyss. However, the Bible clearly contradicted this fallacy in Isaiah 40:22 â€Å"He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers. He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, and spreads them out like a tent to live in. † (Note â€Å"circle of the earth† was made bold to show emphasis) Now let’s stop for a second and remember back to the dating of the Dead Sea Scrolls of which the book of Isaiah was included â€Å"ranges between 408 BCE and 318 CE†. That’s hundreds upon hundreds of years before 1492 when the people of the time swore that the earth was flat. Another good example of science in the Bible can be found in Job 26:7 â€Å"He spreads out the northern skies over empty space; he suspends the earth over nothing. † Surely the people of Isaiah’s time didn’t believe that the planet earth just floated in space attached to nothing. No, of course not, this was long before the age of modern astronomy. So â€Å"how then† you might ask could Job have known to write such a thing. Well, I personally think that the answer to that question as well as many others should be pretty obvious by now. But, just in case I still haven’t made clear my case as to why I believe in the authority of the Bible yet I will continue probing alternate means of determining the Bibles authority. Well, if I’m not going to use archaeology or science as a sole means to validate the Bibles authority then what’s left? How about prophecy? Did you know that the Bible has over twenty-five hundred prophecy’s recorded within its pages? And that of that twenty-five hundred approximately two thousand of them have already come to perfect fruition. I would add that while there are other books out there that have made predictions about the future none have done so with perfection such as the Bible. As a matter of fact the Holy Bible is the only book known to man that can boast such a high percentage of perfectly fulfilled prophecy. But even this, as impressive as it is doesn’t give the authority to the Bible that I feel it truly deserves. No, in all honesty, I would have to say that when it comes to addressing the true and absolute authority of the Bible there can only be one place that that kind of authority could possibly come from†¦. That’s right you guessed it, that kind of authority can only come from God. So why do I personally feel that the Bible has undeniable authority? Because God says it does. And that’s all the reason I need. Conclusion: So in closing I believe that one thing should be noted about both topics that I have written about here today, and that is that no matter what the topic of discussion might be, be it faith in God or the authority if the Bible; only God is worthy and capable of having total authority. Take faith for example, while I could give you all the reasons in the world why you should have faith in God I can’t actually give you that faith, nor can you obtain faith on your own. Only through God can anyone have faith in God. Evidence of this can be seen in Eph. 2:8 â€Å"For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God†. In other words when all is said and done only God has total authority.